The differences between institution, or out of business
Not enough praise is given to great comedy clubs.
Without them, making a career in stand-up comedy would be virtually impossible. Comedy clubs started popping up in America in the 1970s, providing a home for working comedians wherever they performed. Before comedy clubs, comedians who weren’t big enough to tour theaters often worked variety or dinner shows alongside other acts. The birth of the comedy club—a venue solely for stand-up—has greatly improved the industry for both comedians and audiences alike.
It’s a relief to be performing stand-up at a time when amazing comedy clubs are abundant nationwide. However, a lot has changed since the 1970s, especially the dynamic between clubs, comedians, and audiences. While the current “comedy bubble” has led to new clubs opening everywhere, it has also raised questions about the responsibilities of comedy clubs. In this post, I want to break down how these dynamics have shifted, what new responsibilities clubs have, and what they can do to sustain themselves and their importance in comedy.
As hinted at earlier, the distribution of comedy outside of clubs has shifted dramatically, forcing clubs to change their booking philosophies to meet current audiences’ demands. In the early years of comedy clubs (the ’70s–’90s), the priority for booking was to find comedians with established credits. In a pre-internet and pre-social media world, comedians had very little ability to promote their own shows. The responsibility for selling tickets fell almost exclusively on clubs. Being able to advertise a comedian’s credit (HBO, a late-night appearance, comedy radio, Comedy Central, a sitcom, etc.) was the easiest way to capture an audience’s attention and move tickets.
At that time, audience members took a risk on the act, often thinking:
“I’m going to XYZ Comedy Club to see a comedian.”
Clubs had to ensure they booked the best comedians possible to maintain their brand and reputation. As long as a comedian had a recognizable credit to put on a poster, they could sell tickets. If the comedian performed well, the club could get attendees to subscribe to a mailing list or call list, securing repeat customers for life. In those early years, the club itself had to function as a full marketing agency, often employing sales teams to call past customers and inform them about upcoming acts. This made sense in an era where comedians couldn’t directly communicate with their fans.
In recent years, call lists and physical mailing lists have disappeared, replaced by email lists, text lists, and social media. These modern marketing tools are accessible to comedians, shifting the burden of promotion to the performers. Rarely do clubs still employ full-time marketing teams—those days are largely over. This shift hasn’t necessarily made booking easier. In the past, a comedian’s credit was the primary factor in securing a booking, with clubs shouldering the responsibility of selling tickets. Now, comedy clubs must ensure they book comedians with their own audience or marketing capabilities to sell out shows.
This change has altered the audience’s mentality to:
“I’m going to a comedy club to see XYZ Comedian.”
Is it still the club’s responsibility to move tickets, or is it now the comedian’s? Many clubs have leaned into short-term gains, prioritizing influencers and whoever is trending this quarter. However, the best clubs nationwide still emphasize quality above all else. This approach has led to success even on weeknight shows. Quality booking create quality shows, which creates loyal audiences that decide make comedy nights a tradition. Ideally, more clubs would adopt this model, but many—due to geography and other constraints—struggle to consistently book top-tier acts or attract celebrity drop-ins. The best solution? Cultivate great local talent.
Many great comedy scenes exist in smaller cities because clubs take the time to develop local talent. Conversely, some major comedy scenes have declined due to clubs neglecting to foster new comedians. When a club invests in developing local talent, it benefits the entire community. A typical talent progression path for comedians in a comedy club looks like this:
Showcase Act → Weekend Host → Weekend Feature → Headliner → Touring Professional
If a club successfully nurtures talent over the years, its comedians often become national touring acts. These comedians frequently return to their home club to find new openers and feature acts, sometimes even dropping in on local showcases. This elevates both the club’s reputation and the next generation of comedians. While there is no one-size-fits-all method of developing talent, there are traits I’ve observed in all clubs that consistently produce quality acts.
One key trait of all great development clubs—regardless of their market size—is transparency. Having a clear and open path for comedians to advance within a venue solves most problems. If comedians aren’t provided a clear and openly communicated path forward they will fall off or lose faith in a clubs process.
The second thing every great development club does is maintain internal quality control. When bookers fail to observe and scout local talent regularly, they start to rely on vouches, leading to cliques and gatekeeping, which stifles development.
A common development pipeline might look like this:
Scouted Mic/Showcase → Booked Showcase → Host → Feature → Headliner
The best development-focused clubs guide comedians every step of the way. When a booker becomes disengaged, mediocrity becomes the status quo. Unready comedians slip through the cracks, while previously strong performers grow complacent. To maintain quality, clubs must be willing to cut or demote comedians who stagnate, ensuring fresh talent has the opportunity to rise.
With rare exceptions whoever is in charge of talent development should not be a comedian. Almost without fail, having a comedian in this role leads to favoritism, with unready performers trading stage time or attempting to “buy” bookings. The person developing talent should be removed from off-stage politics and able to make unbiased decisions.
Good talent development will naturally lead to disparities in opportunity. Some comedians will get more showcase spots than others. Some will rise faster. Some will take control of their careers and build their audiences at a quicker pace. That’s okay. Success and ambition should be rewarded. This will lead to resentment from unready comedians which is why booking should not be held by a comedian.
Not every club exists in a city with a big or strong enough scene to develop talent. If you do not have comedians ready to advance you might not be ready to host a showcase. It is okay for development to take time. Do not force unready talent on all shows, clubs must also prioritize putting on great shows for their audiences. A great development club strikes a balance between nurturing local comedians and booking top-tier talent, providing great shows for their audiences.
Beyond talent development and booking, a comedy club’s success depends on how well it is run as a business. A club’s environment plays a crucial role in fostering great performances and creating a welcoming experience for both comedians and audiences. The best clubs pay attention to the details: ensuring the showroom is well-designed to minimize noise from the bar, keeping the green room clean and comfortable for comedians, and training staff to treat both performers and guests with professionalism and kindness.
Additionally, comedy clubs should provide headliners and local comedians with resources beyond just stage time. Paying comedians fairly, and on time, helps build trust and maintain strong working relationships. Offering high-quality photos and videos from performances gives comedians valuable promotional material, helping them grow their audience and, in turn, making future shows more successful.
A well-run comedy club isn’t just a venue; it’s a place where comedians can hone their craft, audiences can experience incredible performances, and the art of stand-up can thrive. The clubs that recognize this and invest in both their performers and their business will not only survive but become institutions provide quality entertainment to their communities while cultivating an enviroment for comedians to thrive.